<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fools being Dumb agents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fools-being-dumb-agents</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The (Asset Management) World is Flat : DumbAgent.com</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>The (Asset Management) World is Flat : DumbAgent.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>[...] find it interesting to pit these investors against the Motley Fool&#8217;s CAPS (already discussed here). It would be an interesting clash of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find it interesting to pit these investors against the Motley Fool&#8217;s CAPS (already discussed here). It would be an interesting clash of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-968</guid>
		<description>Or you could post when you &quot;sell&quot; or &quot;cover&quot; a stock to track your progress. It&#039;d be a nice exercise in technical analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you could post when you &#8220;sell&#8221; or &#8220;cover&#8221; a stock to track your progress. It&#8217;d be a nice exercise in technical analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-951</guid>
		<description>As in we should &#039;get out&#039; once our financial goals of x dollars in gains is met rather than applying a specific time frame to how long we should hold onto the stocks. Otherwise, we could potentially hold the stocks forever and never really realize a loss or gain. I might be completely wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As in we should &#8216;get out&#8217; once our financial goals of x dollars in gains is met rather than applying a specific time frame to how long we should hold onto the stocks. Otherwise, we could potentially hold the stocks forever and never really realize a loss or gain. I might be completely wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ocean</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-946</link>
		<dc:creator>Ocean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-946</guid>
		<description>As in? I meant when should we check back to see how we did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As in? I meant when should we check back to see how we did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-943</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s better to approach this from a payoff perspective rather than a time frame no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s better to approach this from a payoff perspective rather than a time frame no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ocean</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Ocean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-922</guid>
		<description>What kind of time frame do you think would work? I left it open here, thinking I&#039;d check back in around 3 months, and 6 and so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of time frame do you think would work? I left it open here, thinking I&#8217;d check back in around 3 months, and 6 and so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://dumbagent.com/fools-being-dumb-agents/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dumbagent.com/?p=711#comment-921</guid>
		<description>I think FCX looks the best out of the stocks bought. For shorting... I&#039;d go with GM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think FCX looks the best out of the stocks bought. For shorting&#8230; I&#8217;d go with GM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

